NeoBinaries Logo Register  |  Login
 
 
 
     
Subscribe
 
RSS Feeds
Latest Apps
News Blog
NewsLetter
Free NewsLetter Free NewsLetter
 
 
 
View All Jobs
 


Link to us
 
Like this site? Put this cool little button on your site and let your users know about NEO Binaries - Your definitive web 2.0 guide
 
NEO Binaries: Link to us
 
 
 
 
Your Ad Here
Subject: Web2.0 companies and their business models
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Romasha
Posts: 10
Online: User is Offline

NEObie
NEObie



04/12/2006 3:42 PM Alert 
Do web2.0 companies actually make money? Do they have concrete business models? Though the strategy most of them have seems to be wait and get acquired by a microsoft, google or yahoo and the others depend on ads. But the question is, how long would a company survive on ads?

The general business model for a web2.0 company i can figure is release the first version (normally beta) for free, attract a whole lot of users and then offer them premium services at a cost. FlickrBox.net and many other such apps follow a similar model.
 
The advantage that these companies have is that once a user puts his/her data in a service, it becomes slightly difficult for them to move out and shift loyalties. And as time passes by, a few companies might stay others might be acquired by the industry biggies.

So, i think this can be called a successful business model, that most of these web2.0 companies are following. But the doubt is, will one of these companies grow to be another google or yahoo or microsoft?
GirishLaikhra
Posts: 2
Online: User is Offline

NEObie
NEObie



09/29/2009 11:02 AM Alert 
Posted By Romasha on 04/12/2006 3:42 PM
Do web2.0 companies actually make money? Do they have concrete business models? Though the strategy most of them have seems to be wait and get acquired by a microsoft, google or yahoo and the others depend on ads. But the question is, how long would a company survive on ads?

The general business model for a web2.0 company i can figure is release the first version (normally beta) for free, attract a whole lot of users and then offer them premium services at a cost. FlickrBox.net and many other such apps follow a similar model.
 
The advantage that these companies have is that once a user puts his/her data in a service, it becomes slightly difficult for them to move out and shift loyalties. And as time passes by, a few companies might stay others might be acquired by the industry biggies.

So, i think this can be called a successful business model, that most of these web2.0 companies are following. But the doubt is, will one of these companies grow to be another google or yahoo or microsoft?

hello guys i am new here dear i read your comment i learn alot of things from your comment it's great dear thanx for this information.
--------
Girish
--------




Nissan Xterra Parts
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > Web2.0 > Web2.0 The Concept > Web2.0 companies and their business models

A Cynapse Invention

Cynapse Logo
Copyright 2005 - 2006 NEO Binaries: Your definitive web 2.0 guide.    Terms Of Use        Privacy Statement
 
Bliki, Information Management Systems Comparison, Benefits of 'SaaS', Knowledge Management, Document Management, Enterprise Content Management, Digital Asset Management, Secure Online File Storage, Version Control System, Group Collaboration, Content Delivery and RSS casting, Personal Information Management, Community and Enterprise Blogs, Corporate Intranets, Integrated Word Processor